<?xml version="1.0"?> <rss version="2.0">
<channel>
  <title>Really Annoying Shit - Technology Feed</title>
  <link>http://www.reallyannoyingshit.com?sh=technology</link>
  <description>Your source of news, complaints, protest, bad service,and all modern day Technology annoyances. </description>
  <language>en-gb</language>
  <copyright>Copyright 2007 Eriginal Ltd</copyright> 
<item>
	<title>Non Iron Shrits and the Blog Awards</title>
		<link>http://www.reallyannoyingshit.com/detcom.php?blogid=387</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.reallyannoyingshit.com/detcom.php?blogid=387</guid>
<pubDate>10 Sep 2008 09:22:50 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
<p>I thought this might be the smallest blog post in the world but I remembered Blacksheep already won the blog awards in that category for his blog which contained no content at all. That untitled blog, which his harshest critics lambasted as being an error, also, controversially, won best punctuation and spelling for a blog. </p>
<p>And, as if that wasn't enough hardware for the night, his blog also won first place for best regional submission from an area around Maynooth. Fans admire the blog post for its <b>nihilistic candour</b> and have even drawn parallels to <b>the ground breaking conceptual artist, Marcel Duchamp</b>. </p>
<p>For me, I think he made an error, was too eager with the return key. I can't even link direct to the blank post as the lack of title means it can't be indexed, but enough about the blog awards, I want to talk about shirts. </p>
<p><strong><font color="#990000">Why is it when you buy a non iron shirt the first thing you have to do is iron it to take the creases out?</font></strong> </p>
]]>
</description>
</item>
<item>
	<title></title>
		<link>http://www.reallyannoyingshit.com/detcom.php?blogid=358</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.reallyannoyingshit.com/detcom.php?blogid=358</guid>
<pubDate>19 Jul 2008 07:38:30 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[

]]>
</description>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Cheap Calls,Landline</title>
		<link>http://www.reallyannoyingshit.com/detcom.php?blogid=320</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.reallyannoyingshit.com/detcom.php?blogid=320</guid>
<pubDate>28 Mar 2008 10:56:48 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
We oldies don't do much mobile calling but we know about "cheap"! We call Dublin twice a week on our landline at 1 half pence per min. (how do you do fractions?)
How? - Dial 0844 200 20 20. Wait for Robot instructions, then dial Irish Number followed by "hash" (where's that on the keyboard?) They are called "Telestont" I believe.

Calls to uk mobiles from landlines can be made at 10p/min. by dialling 08719 997 997 and follow instructions.

Hope this helps somebody - (Maiden Blog!)
]]>
</description>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Irish iphone</title>
		<link>http://www.reallyannoyingshit.com/detcom.php?blogid=315</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.reallyannoyingshit.com/detcom.php?blogid=315</guid>
<pubDate>04 Mar 2008 09:52:56 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
<p>
When I penned my original&nbsp;blog about iphone, <a href="265/iphone-me-boll---ks.html">iphone me bollocks</a>&nbsp;,this piece of technical crap was'nt available in Ireland yet, well come March 14th all that will change.
</p>
<p>
Please follow the link below as <a href="http://patphelan.net/">Pat Phelan</a> articulates these points much better than me. If you decide to buy one of these phones after reading his blog God help you.
</p>
<p>
&nbsp;
</p>

]]>
</description>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Windows Vista biggest disappointment of 2007</title>
		<link>http://www.reallyannoyingshit.com/detcom.php?blogid=297</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.reallyannoyingshit.com/detcom.php?blogid=297</guid>
<pubDate>17 Dec 2007 14:22:13 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
<p>If you're buying retail and go into any of the high street stores such as PC
World, Comet, Currys, John Lewis, Dixons, Tesco all laptops on sale come
pre-installed with Windows Vista. If you go online to Compaq, Toshiba, Sony, HP,
Acer and the rest, you have no choice but to buy Windows Vista. In fact, all
websites display the same message &quot;Toshiba recommends Windows Vista&quot;,
&quot;HP recommends Windows Vista&quot;, &quot;VAIO recommends Windows
Vista&quot;, &quot;Acer recommends Windows Vista&quot; on and on ad nauseam.</p>
<p>With the consistent wording, these recommendations clearly originate from
Microsoft rather than clinical engineering tests. Microsoft are heavily
incentivising manufacturers to push Vista which has unbelievably been in
development since 2001, consuming Microsoft people and money. Despite this,
Vista, delivered three years late, doesn't perform any better than XP and needs
some serious hardware just to run the graphical &quot;Aero&quot; interface such
as 1GB of system memory and a 40GB hard drive capacity.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
<p>Business customers running Vista Business were thrown a life buoy, being <b>quietly
allowed to &quot;downgrade&quot; to XP</b>. Retail customers, however, don't
have the same licensing choice.&nbsp;If you have it, you're stuck with it. The main change in Vista is the unnecessary user
interface and an improved search function as it tries to catch up with Google.
Oh, and <i>My Computer</i> has been renamed <i>Computer</i>.</p>
<p>With Vista OS I am reminded of the Apple II being replaced with the Apple III
in the early 1980s. The Apple III was designed by Marketeers and was the beginning
of the end of Apples leading market position until it started to find itself
again with the iPod. Vista has the look and feel of a development being led by
Marketeers, it's not an operating system of choice.</p>
<p>So what is the alternative? As you can't seem to buy a laptop with XP you can
return to Apple and the MAC OS (once it's not the &quot;leopard&quot; 10.5) or
you can build your own with a Linux distribution such as <a href="http://www.ubuntu.com/products/WhatIsUbuntu/desktopedition" target="_blank">Ubuntu</a>,
i.e. buy a Vista Laptop and uninstall the Vista OS. For the moment, my choice is
not to buy.</p>
<p>Is it any wonder <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,140583-page,5-c,techindustrytrends/article.html" target="_blank">Vista
is ranked number one by PC World as the biggest tech disappointment of 2007</a>?</p>
<ol>
  <li>Windows Vista</li>
  <li>The High Definition format War</li>
  <li>Facebook Beacon</li>
  <li>Yahoo</li>
  <li>Apple iPhone</li>
  <li>The Broadband Industry</li>
  <li>Voice Over IP</li>
  <li>Apple &quot;Leopard&quot; OS 10.5</li>
  <li>Microsoft Office 2007</li>
  <li>Wireless Carriers</li>
  <li>Microsoft Zune</li>
  <li>Internet Security</li>
  <li>Social Networks</li>
  <li>Municipal WiMax</li>
  <li>Amazon Unbox</li>
</ol>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/GVOnFdMf0RU&rel=1&border=0"></param>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param>
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/GVOnFdMf0RU&rel=1&border=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355">
</embed></object>
]]>
</description>
</item>
<item>
	<title>24 Hour Queue for PC World Website</title>
		<link>http://www.reallyannoyingshit.com/detcom.php?blogid=291</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.reallyannoyingshit.com/detcom.php?blogid=291</guid>
<pubDate>02 Dec 2007 18:54:31 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
<p>Despite having the <a href="http://www.pcworld.co.uk/martprd/editorial/the-techguys/?int=left_nav" target="_blank">Techguys</a>
with &quot;a wealth of knowledge, years of experience and unrivalled expertise
in all manner of computer and technology related challenges&quot; I couldn't get
onto the PC World website as it was too busy. I am advised the store will open
soon, and bizarrely, am asked to try again in 1430 minutes. </p>
<p>1430 minutes, why that's just under 24 hours? What's the matter, can't the
Techguys get the load balancing on the servers right? Is the challenge too
great? Or maybe PC World, ironically, just doesn't have the hardware?</p>
<p>By the way, I assume the 1430 minutes is an error in their calculations,
unless they've been really clever and included a variable to cover the amount of
time a visitor will waste trying to find a laptop without rubbish Vista
installed. </p>
<p>Wouldn't it be useful if PC World added operating system into their search
function? You might feel you actually had a choice, even if it was only to
select XP.</p>
<p><img border="0" src="http://www.reallyannoyingshit.com/img/pc_world2.gif" width="350" height="196" alt="PC World"/></p>

]]>
</description>
</item>
<item>
	<title>About this blog</title>
		<link>http://www.reallyannoyingshit.com/detcom.php?blogid=284</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.reallyannoyingshit.com/detcom.php?blogid=284</guid>
<pubDate>21 Nov 2007 14:28:20 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
I'm only here a day and already I have a moan about it.

Comments. When I want to make one, I scroll down to the bottom of the blog I just read and notice a big ---------------------- dividing line above the comments link which makes it look like that's to place a comment for the blog below so I scroll back up like a good lad to make my comment which of course ends up as a comment in the wrong blog.

Any chance the format could be changed to make it a bit clearer or have the blog printed on the reply page. This would also have the side benefit that you could copy & paste to quote from the blog you are replying to.
]]>
</description>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Easyspace and their off-shore support service</title>
		<link>http://www.reallyannoyingshit.com/detcom.php?blogid=269</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.reallyannoyingshit.com/detcom.php?blogid=269</guid>
<pubDate>23 Sep 2007 23:32:37 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
<p>Since Easyspace was <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/09/06/iomart_easyspace/" target="_blank">acquired
by Iomart for &pound;10.5M</a> at the tail end of 2004 services have been in decline.
One of the problems, and I speak as a user and customer of Easyspace since the
90's, has been in their outsourcing of support services to India. When support
was based on shore in Byfleet, Surrey, the technical response and customer
service experience, was always spot on.&nbsp;</p>
<p>This Thursday I contacted Easyspace support with a very simple problem to
resolve. I had tried, unsuccessfully, to renew five of the domains in my stable
with a debit card, as I have been doing, for what must be now almost ten
years.&nbsp;</p>
<p>The response I got back on my support ticket, time stamped 4:33am (about 9am
local time India) claimed &quot;Debit Card is for Monthly Customers Only.&quot;,
and prompts me to follow a link about payment methods which goes on to explain
about direct debits.&nbsp;</p>
<p>My query had asked &quot;I have tried to renew these [domains] on three
separate occasions, even using different debit cards but I keep getting the same
message - unable to process at this time.&quot;.... </p>
<p><img border="0" src="http://www.reallyannoyingshit.com/img/easyspace3.jpg" width="330" height="226" alt="Easyspace customer support"/> </p>
<p>Iomart is a public company. You expect an appreciation of the difference
between a debit card and a direct debit, but there isn't one. Perhaps this is an
outcome of not properly managing an outsourced function, where you end up
getting a customer response which begins &quot;this is the wrong answer&quot;. </p>
<p>Of course, since last year I have been migrating all my services away from
Easyspace, ever since I had been encouraged / miss-sold an upgrade to a
dedicated server with a rubbish Plaxo control panel. In fact, this is the reason
I registered the domain, reallyannoyshit.com and started this blog. Over a year
later and this company are still annoying the s... out of me, and are still
getting it wrong. </p>
]]>
</description>
</item>
<item>
	<title>iPhone me Boll   ks</title>
		<link>http://www.reallyannoyingshit.com/detcom.php?blogid=265</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.reallyannoyingshit.com/detcom.php?blogid=265</guid>
<pubDate>19 Sep 2007 20:26:55 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
<p>The headline says it all "iGeeks" await €1400 iPhone launch" well there you have it, Steve Jobs was in London yesterday to launch and announce the coming of the new iPhone which will be available from November 9 2007, mark your diary.</p>
<p>&nbsp;I suppose that there will be many that will be looking forward to the launch and more luck to you, but heres the beauty of this product, it will not be able to operate on 3G in Europe, that right it will not be 3G compatible, the so called "donkeys bollock's" of phone,music, and internet technology will operate at the same speed of dial up internet connection, brilliant, I suppose that when you buy the phone you'll be handed a 10 mile telephone cable which you will use to "Dial -up", but at least you'll be connected, albeit physically.</p>
<p>&nbsp;Whilst the world has moved on in technological term's Apple still makes shite products but use's marketing ploys to tempt you into the Den that is non-compatibility, isolation and uselessness, but whipping £899 (€1400 approx) out of your pocket, remember "<strong>I'm PC, I'm Mac</strong>" well there you go, additionally it also be said that the same phone that does'nt work on 3G is available in the US for $399 and $599 in Japan but this price is under review, why, because the Japanese are'nt stupid.</p>
<p>&nbsp;I suppose the next announcement from Jobs will be that Web 2.0 is overrated and the feck'in thing will be Web 1.0 compatible, or if that fails they will buy Digitals Vax.VMs system from a down and out on the street and get the Marketing Department working on it.</p>
<p>Christ as a child I used to get two tin can's put a hole in each, connect with string, and talk to my fellow soldiers during "our war", now Apple has "sexed" it up, to the Patent Lawyers seems to be the only option.</p>
<p>&nbsp;Feck I'm annoyed by this Sh##t. </p>
]]>
</description>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Nothing to Fear from Wi-Fi Radiation</title>
		<link>http://www.reallyannoyingshit.com/detcom.php?blogid=218</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.reallyannoyingshit.com/detcom.php?blogid=218</guid>
<pubDate>05 Jun 2007 14:12:52 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
<p>Government insist there is <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/6676129.stm"> no risk from Wi-Fi radiation</a></p>
<p><img border="0" src="http://www.reallyannoyingshit.com/img/blair_wifi.gif" width="200" height="277" alt="Government: no danger from Wi-Fi radiation"/></p>

<p>
Read what other bloggers are saying....
</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://rhetoricallyspeaking.blogspot.com/2007/06/further-wi-fi-fun-trading-on-fear.html">BookDrunk</a></li>
<li><a href="http://nextlust.com/wi-fi-can-cause-radiation-but-its-convenient-so-who-cares">NextLust</a></li>

<li><a href="http://crisisblogger.wordpress.com/2007/06/04/the-media-fueled-frenzy-re-wi-fi-dangers/">ChrisBlogger</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.parentdish.com/2007/04/23/uk-health-watchdog-calls-for-wifi-radation-inquiry/">ParentDish</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.technovia.co.uk/?p=1133">Technovia</a></li>
<li><a href="http://letters.computing.co.uk/2007/05/why_wifi_is_fin.html">Computing</a></li>
<li><a href="http://digamy.blogspot.com/2007/05/rant-about-wifi.html">Digamy</a></li>
]]>
</description>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Pacman eats XBox</title>
		<link>http://www.reallyannoyingshit.com/detcom.php?blogid=208</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.reallyannoyingshit.com/detcom.php?blogid=208</guid>
<pubDate>29 May 2007 16:52:05 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
<p>Play once and it becomes an effort to stop. No fancy Xbox needed, no shoot em up gore...</p>
</p>
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://widgetserver.com/syndication/subscriber/InsertPanel.js?panelId=abc85c32-3379-42d6-aa41-b6ac17762b27"></script>This script runs Pacman

]]>
</description>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Oppression</title>
		<link>http://www.reallyannoyingshit.com/detcom.php?blogid=122</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.reallyannoyingshit.com/detcom.php?blogid=122</guid>
<pubDate>22 Jan 2007 21:42:55 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
<!--
<p>I noticed your 'Thought for the day'&nbsp;<font size="3"><em><font size="2"> 
...</font></em></font></p>
<p><font size="3"><em><strong>Oppression can only survive through silence' 
</strong></em></font></p>
<p><strong><em><font size="3">.... </font></em></strong>and thought you are 
incorrect to post this here above anywhere else. </p>
<p>There are many forms of oppression that manifests itself in our daily lives 
and one is on this very site. You can reply to blogs posted by others, but it is 
up to the original 'Blogger' to censor these and&nbsp;decide whether they should 
be viewed by others or not.&nbsp;</p>
<p>There is one particular Blogger on this site (hint... he may live on a farm) 
that deletes nearly every comment you post,&nbsp;but not his responses to these 
comments with the net effect, that he appears to be commenting on his own 
comments !! How silly is that?</p>
<p>I am feeling very oppressed on this site..!!!</p>
<p>Comments appreciated, but be warned I may delete them in revenge...!!!</p>
-->
]]>
</description>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Monster works for me</title>
		<link>http://www.reallyannoyingshit.com/detcom.php?blogid=120</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.reallyannoyingshit.com/detcom.php?blogid=120</guid>
<pubDate>19 Jan 2007 10:58:04 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[

<p>Monster is a&nbsp;jobs board, which in the UK is billed as a leading careers 
website. The marketing <b>gump</b> on their web site includes the following 
statements</p>
<ul>
<li><i>It's</i> committed to connecting organisations with individuals 
<li>helps you explore the possibilities and find the opportunities that are 
right for you 
<li>Offers innovative technology and first class services 
<li>Changes the way people look for jobs and employers look for people 
<li>Contains a searchable database 
<li>Is part of Monster Worldwide Inc., (NASDAQ: MNST), a member of S&amp;P 500 
index and the NASDAQ 100. </li></ul>
<p>They are currently spending god knows how much on their &quot;<b>monster works for 
me</b>&quot; global add campaign. Rob Brouwer, CEO, Monster UK &amp; Ireland, 
comments &quot;It's aim is to encourage and motivate candidates towards a positive 
career move in 2007 based on their own individual needs or desires - the reason 
they go to work&quot;.</p>
<p>Call me old fashioned but for me one of the key reasons people go to work is 
to be paid, but with all this &quot;<b>innovative technology&quot;</b> and &quot;<b>searchable 
database</b>&quot; thingy there is no way to filter your results by how much you 
would like to be paid or a minimum salary requirement. Everything is jumbled in 
together and it's a hit and miss whether the optional keywords field will 
successfully filter out what you don't want. The chances are it will also filter 
out the jobs you do want as they simply may not contain the chosen keyword.</p>
<p>The search structure is basically ten years old Web 1.0 (&quot;very 1998&quot;) and you 
can't find anything on it unless you're prepared to set up camp for the day and 
&quot;pan for gold&quot;. It would make far more sense to use some of that TV money to add 
new search parameters or new table columns or tables to the database. In fact, 
such small changes might only take a week of development work for one person, 
I'm sure this cost is probably less than the cost of one TV advert.</p>
<p>Rob, I am certainly motivated towards a positive career move, your marketing 
team have devised a good add, I just wish that when I peeled that label off 
there might have been some &quot;innovative technology&quot; and a &quot;searchable 
database&quot;.</p>
]]>
</description>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Cork City .ie</title>
		<link>http://www.reallyannoyingshit.com/detcom.php?blogid=97</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.reallyannoyingshit.com/detcom.php?blogid=97</guid>
<pubDate>21 Dec 2006 14:03:32 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
<p>
I recently heard <a href="http://www.corkcity.ie">the Cork City Council web site</a> was being 
criticized for failing to really appreciate the needs of the people who might 
use it, in particular it didn't consider how the site might be displayed by 
other browsers. This seems to have culminated in the Council putting a note on 
the site saying it &quot;will only operate correctly by using Microsoft Internet 
Explorer 5.5. or greater&quot;. The user is then invited to &quot;upgrade&quot;. </p>

<p>
With close to 90% of browsers already using Internet Explorer 6 or above or using
<a href="http://en.www.mozilla.com/en/firefox/">the superior Firefox browser</a> 
the number of people this invitation would apply to is a very small 
minority, given that we must also count browsers such as Safari and Opera. </p>

<p>
To change from Firefox to IE would actually be a downgrade. The W3C browser statistics for November 
'06, rate
<a href="http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp">Firefox browser usage 
at just under 30%</a>, as it continues to take market share away from Microsoft's 
Internet Explorer. The Council web site does not display properly in this 
browser, suggesting it was only developed on Internet Explorer and not tested on 
other environments.&nbsp; By web standards, this is very un PC (boom boom), as 
it has the potential to alienate a substantial number of visitors..  </p>

<p>
W3C, shorthand for the World Wide Web Consortium, are the standards body for the web. 
They develop and define 
the language standards that ensure the universality of the web. In addition to 
Cork City Council ignoring users with other browsers, the website doesn't meet 
these standards set by the W3C. In fact, it contains twenty three errors, which 
realistically, would take about ten minutes to correct.</p>

<p>
They do include an accessibility roadmap which does mention attaining AA and AAA 
accessibility standards. This is all very well, but it's usually better to start 
at the begining: Lads, aim for the A standard first, a good point to start at 
would be to correct the twenty three errors, and sort out displaying the site on 
other browsers. As a local government body you should be setting a standard. <b>
Upgrade.</b></p>
]]>
</description>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Automatically starting programs</title>
		<link>http://www.reallyannoyingshit.com/detcom.php?blogid=84</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.reallyannoyingshit.com/detcom.php?blogid=84</guid>
<pubDate>08 Dec 2006 10:51:18 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
<p>
When you start your computer the chances are you could actually go away and 
make a coffee while you wait for it to complete. Overtime your computer becomes 
so slow that you either replace it or you take a hammer to it in a moment of 
angry frustration. You only have a 256K or 128K memory card when they seem to be 
churning them out now with a 1GB card as standard.</p>

<p>
Of course, this will help, and you will see an instant difference at start-up. 
Until, that is, you start to install all the other programs you used to run on 
your old computer.


</p>

<p>
The majority of these programs think you want to use them every time you start 
your computer. They also think it's perfectly ok to communicate with &quot;VGER&quot; when 
you're connected to the internet and even try to automatically restart your 
computer if they find and install an update. Marketing are likely to consider it 
beneficial to have the program load automatically. The user isn't likely to 
quickly forget the software or the maker or use an alternative, you're right 
there in their face every day.


</p>

<p>
This is fine if you actually want to use the program every day. If you only want 
to use it periodically then you should be able to easily turn it off, and when I 
say &quot;easily&quot; I mean you don't need a computer degree to do so or have to type &quot;msconfig&quot; 
or &quot;regedit&quot; into the start and run menu. Personally,&nbsp; I would prefer my 
computer to start with only one program, Kaspersky anti-virus software. 
Everything else I would like to choose to start when I am ready.</p>

<p>
However, the default on the majority of software installations seems to be to 
run when windows starts and to automatically search for updates or newer 
versions of the software when you're connected to the internet without giving 
you the option to change it.


</p>

<p>
I was actually surprised that MSN Messenger 7 included the ability to un-tick 
&quot;run this program when Windows starts&quot; in the options tab. Prior to this version 
this wasn't included as an option. Instead you had to click start and run. Type 
in regedit.exe and click ok. Navigate to HKEY_CURRENT_USERSoftwareMicrosoftWindowsCurrentVersionun. 
Once you're there click on the MSMSGS entry and select delete. Then click yes to 
confirm.</p>

<p>
At least one piece of software has made a positive change, if only the rest 
would follow.</p>
]]>
</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>